Neville's vision of being taken into the Divine Assembly

Neville recounted, in a 1968 lecture, that back in July 1929 he was taken in spirit into the Divine Assembly, meeting a ledger-keeping angelic being, then Infinite Love, and finally Infinite Might, who told him "Time to act."

Person: Neville Goddard

Date (happened)
July 1929
certain
  1. July 1929 conclusion
    Reasoning Passage 528340 states directly 'about 4:00 in the morning in the month of July of 1929' for the return from the Divine Assembly; this is consistent with and sharpens the already-preferred 'summer of '29' (delta 18) and the overwhelming 1929/age-24 corroboration across dozens of independent tellings (1963-1972).
  2. July 1929 stated · preferred
    Source Predestined Glory ¶6
    Why CloudThree H006
    Reasoning 'About 4:00 in the morning in the month of July of 1929' (Predestined Glory, nid 1035, same lecture as passage 528337 'this month back in 1929').
  3. c. July 1929 stated · probable
    Source Neville Goddard Research What Is The Divine Society ¶8"back thirty years before it happened, back in 1929, I was taken in spirit into the Divine Assembly"
  4. c. 1929 stated
    Source stated by Neville: 1929 (2 statements, told 1968-1969)
  5. 1929 stated
    Source Predestined Glory ¶4"It was this month back in 1929. I was then a dancer. I was 24 years of age", told in Predestined Glory (nid 1035)
  6. between 1929 and 1939 stated · probable
    Source The Pure in Heart ¶18"one night", told in The Pure in Heart (nid 1085)
  7. 1929 stated · probable
    Source Twenty-Seven Heavens ¶13"this night", told in Twenty-Seven Heavens (nid 1183)
  8. c. 1929 stated · probable
    Source This My Name Forever I Am ¶19"when I was a lad in my twenties", told in This My Name Forever I Am (nid 1185)
Show all 60 claims
  1. 1929 stated · probable
    Source Power Sent Me ¶43"the night I was taken into the divine assembly", told in Power Sent Me (nid 1330)
  2. 1929 stated
    Source The Heavenly Vision ¶15"when I was twenty-four in 1929", told in The Heavenly Vision (nid 1400)
  3. 1929 stated
    Source The Mystery of Grace ¶2"in 1929", told in The Mystery of Grace (nid 1414)
  4. 1929 stated
    Source Experience Scripture ¶26"in 1929", told in Experience Scripture (nid 1904)
  5. 1929 stated
    Source "many years ago, the year 1929", told in Test Yourself (nid 1921)
  6. 1929 stated
    Source Signs End July 26 Marines Memorial Club San Francisco ¶21"back thirty years before it happened, back in 1929", told in Signs End July 26 Marines Memorial Club San Francisco (nid 1999)
  7. 1929 stated
    Source Test Yourself Realneville ¶16"many years ago, the year 1929", told in Test Yourself Realneville (nid 2053)
  8. c. 1929 stated · probable
    Source Now My Eye Sees Thee ¶4"that day back in the twenties", told in Now My Eye Sees Thee (nid 2253)
  9. between June 1929 and August 1929 stated
    Source God Only Acts ¶10"in the summer of ’29", told in God Only Acts (nid 30)
  10. 1929 stated
    Source "in 1929", told in The I of Man (Unresolved ASR Witness) (nid 3987)
  11. c. 1929 stated · probable
    Source Moses Elijah Jesus ¶10"Thirty odd years ago", told in Moses Elijah Jesus (nid 2009)
  12. before 15 February 1963 bound
    Source Moses Elijah Jesus ¶10bound from passage 551451 / telling lecture nid 2009
    Reasoning P551451 is retrospective personal testimony; the event had occurred before lecture nid 2009's delivery date. Non-preferred bound only.
  13. before 1967 bound · possible
    Source qualifying source passages 531429; telling lecture nids 1144
    Reasoning Qualifying passage ids [531429] belong to telling lecture nids [1144]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1967 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1967 is the MIN across telling lectures.
  14. before 1969 bound · possible
    Source corrected envelope; qualifying source passage 531429; telling lecture nids 1144
    Why Corrects the phase4 L6a envelope on this event from before 1967 to before 1969.
    Reasoning Envelope recompute, arithmetic only. The phase4 L6a row on this event states its own rule: each telling lecture contributes MAX of its non-refuted delivery years, and the envelope is the MIN across telling lectures. Recomputed live over lecture nid(s) 1144 that row cites, MAX(non-refuted field_delivery_year) gives 1969, not the 1967 the row carries — the bound was below its own stated rule and therefore UNSAFE: it asserted the event did not happen in 2 year(s) where it may sit. Same premise, same evidence, no re-reading and no re-judgement; only the maximum was taken correctly. The L6a row stands beside this one (append-only). Ruling: #2235 delta 1, architect 378.
  15. before 1970 bound · possible
    Source qualifying source passages 549867; telling lecture nids 1950
    Reasoning Qualifying passage ids [549867] belong to telling lecture nids [1950]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1970 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1970 is the MIN across telling lectures.
  16. before 28 April 1969 bound
    Source The passage recounts the incorporation as completed before Neville tells it in A Riddle; node 1950's adjudicated surviving delivery date is 1969-04-28.
    Reasoning Passage 549867 uses completed first-person narration ('I was sent' and 'then to be incorporated') and explicitly frames Neville as now telling the story. The experience must precede this telling. The carrier node's authoritative non-refuted delivery anchor is 1969-04-28 at certain confidence, so weakest-link propagation supports a certain before-1969-04-28 bound. The prior before-1970 possible claim was derived from the now-refuted delivery date and is superseded in substance only.
  17. between 1929 and 1959 stated
    Source Invisible ¶30"It is 1929, all right, so I was 24 ... when I was 54 years of age", told in Invisible (nid 1981)
  18. 1929 stated · probable
    Source derived from the event's own title: "Neville receives his Call in 1929"
    Reasoning The event held NO date claim of any kind; its own title states 1929 (year precision, parsed as "year only"). ⚠ A title in this corpus is a DERIVED artefact — an earlier pass wrote it from the passage text — so this claim is title-derived and is marked as such rather than cited as a source document; the underlying text remains the real evidence and would supersede it. Confidence `probable`, never `certain`, for that reason. Precision is never inflated beyond the title's own wording. CALIBRATION (run v1.1/l1.4/titledate, against the 489 events that already hold an independent preferred date): day 96.1%, month 94.1% agreement. Titles naming a REFERENCE event rather than the event itself ("before", "after", "during the week of", "per ... lecture") are refused outright and never reach this write — reading an anchor as the date is the same laundering phase3b committed when it wrote telling dates onto events.
  19. 1929 stated
    Source passage 551255, 'this month back in 1929'
    Reasoning Neville directly states 1929; 'this month' cannot yield a calendar month because lecture 2001 has only an open post-1965 delivery bound.
  20. 1929 stated
    Source Call Upon Self ¶18"in 1929", told in Call Upon Self (nid 1924)
  21. before 1972 bound · possible
    Source Consummation ¶10qualifying source passages 542310; telling lecture nids 1539
    Reasoning Qualifying passage ids [542310] belong to telling lecture nids [1539]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1972 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1972 is the MIN across telling lectures.
  22. before 28 April 1972 bound
    Source Consummationtelling lecture nid 1539, certain delivery 1972-04-28
    Why Tightens the phase4 L6a envelope from before 1972 to before 1972-04-28.
    Reasoning L6a envelope tightened to the telling day of nid 1539 (certain delivery 1972-04-28); same premise, finer precision. The phase4 L6a bound on this event is `before 1972`, an envelope over delivery YEARS computed without reading text. Its premise is that the fact is true by the time it is told; on that same premise the DAY of the telling is a strictly better upper bound. Nothing is re-decided — the bound is stated to the precision the evidence always supported. The delivery claim for 1972-04-28 on nid 1539 is held at `certain` by the corpus, which is what carries this claim. #2274; the L6a row stands beside this one.
  23. 1929 estimated
    Source Call Upon Self ¶18passage 549240: 'he called me in 1929, embraced me, I fused with him, and then he sent me'
    Why Corrects the delivery-envelope-only dating with the event's stated year.
    Reasoning The target event is the risen Lord embracing and sending Neville. Passage 549240 narrates the same sequence—called, embraced, fused, sent—and explicitly places it in 1929; passage 542310 supplies the associated 'down with the blue bloods' commission wording.
  24. before 16 June 1959 bound
    Source The Cup and the Cross ¶5
    Reasoning Passage 529061 (nid 1057, pos 5) opens 'Years ago I was sent to do this work that I am doing. I was told, "Go! And down with the blue-bloods!"' -- a plain, unambiguous first-person statement that the commissioning predates the moment of speaking. Lecture 1057's own delivery date, 1959-06-16, is independently corroborated (catalog #102, certain; site byline chrome dateline, certain; no conflict between them), so the bound's anchor is solid. No number of years or specific date is given in the text, so only a 'before' bound is supportable, not an estimated year -- writing more would invent precision the passage does not carry.
  25. c. 1929 estimated · probable
    Why M7 dating pass (529; 525's readers, packet 002)
    Reasoning Passage 529061 gives only 'years ago', but the same command 'down with the blue-bloods' follows his fusion with infinite love, which other certain-dated records place in 1929 ('called, embraced, fused, and sent in 1929', chronology 18443; 17240 'sent to teach in 1929'; also 8872). The 1959 dates on 7465/15314 look like telling-year slips.
  26. before 1971 bound · possible
    Source God's Law and His Promise ¶43qualifying source passages 527888; telling lecture nids 1021
    Reasoning Qualifying passage ids [527888] belong to telling lecture nids [1021]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1971 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1971 is the MIN across telling lectures.
  27. before 1959 bound · possible
    Source The Cup and the Cross ¶5qualifying source passages 529061; telling lecture nids 1057
    Reasoning Qualifying passage ids [529061] belong to telling lecture nids [1057]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1959 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1959 is the MIN across telling lectures.
  28. before 16 June 1959 bound
    Source The Cup and the Crosstelling lecture nid 1057, certain delivery 1959-06-16
    Why Tightens the phase4 L6a envelope from before 1959 to before 1959-06-16.
    Reasoning L6a envelope tightened to the telling day of nid 1057 (certain delivery 1959-06-16); same premise, finer precision. The phase4 L6a bound on this event is `before 1959`, an envelope over delivery YEARS computed without reading text. Its premise is that the fact is true by the time it is told; on that same premise the DAY of the telling is a strictly better upper bound. Nothing is re-decided — the bound is stated to the precision the evidence always supported. The delivery claim for 1959-06-16 on nid 1057 is held at `certain` by the corpus, which is what carries this claim. #2274; the L6a row stands beside this one.
  29. before 1965 bound · possible
    Source The State of Paul ¶68qualifying source passages 533925; telling lecture nids 1226
    Reasoning Qualifying passage ids [533925] belong to telling lecture nids [1226]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1965 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1965 is the MIN across telling lectures.
  30. before 7 December 1965 bound · probable
    Source The State of Pauldelivery claim d1 on lecture nid 1226 (chrome dateline '12/7/65', probable, preferred), corroborated by the lecture's own 'series reopens Tuesday' schedule reference
    Why Refines the stored 1965-??-?? before-bound (source passage:533925, run corpus v1/phase4 L6a) to day precision now that the lecture's delivery date is understood to be 12-07, not the catalogue's 12-04.
    Reasoning The vision must have already occurred by the time Neville recounts it from the platform, so the telling date is an upper bound; the corrected, preferred delivery date for the sole telling lecture (1965-12-07, probable) refines the stored year-level 'before 1965' bound to day precision.
  31. between June 1929 and August 1929 estimated · probable
    Source The State of Paul ¶68
    Why M7 dating pass (529; 525's readers, packet 012)
    Reasoning He quoted the last verse of 1 Cor 13 'when I stood in the presence of the risen Christ' (passage 533925), the question-and-love sequence he elsewhere dates to 1929 (chronology 18117 'taken before the risen Lord in 1929', 1929-06..1929-08; 7010; 18443). The October 1966 commissioning (9065) is later than this telling, so it is not this.
  32. before 1966 bound · possible
    Source Everyone Has the Plan in Him ¶25qualifying source passages 534123; telling lecture nids 1234
    Reasoning Qualifying passage ids [534123] belong to telling lecture nids [1234]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1966 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1966 is the MIN across telling lectures.
  33. before 24 January 1966 bound
    Source Everyone Has the Plan in Himtelling lecture nid 1234, certain delivery 1966-01-24
    Why Tightens the phase4 L6a envelope from before 1966 to before 1966-01-24.
    Reasoning L6a envelope tightened to the telling day of nid 1234 (certain delivery 1966-01-24); same premise, finer precision. The phase4 L6a bound on this event is `before 1966`, an envelope over delivery YEARS computed without reading text. Its premise is that the fact is true by the time it is told; on that same premise the DAY of the telling is a strictly better upper bound. Nothing is re-decided — the bound is stated to the precision the evidence always supported. The delivery claim for 1966-01-24 on nid 1234 is held at `certain` by the corpus, which is what carries this claim. #2274; the L6a row stands beside this one.
  34. between June 1929 and August 1929 estimated · probable
    Source Everyone Has the Plan in Him ¶25
    Why M7 dating pass (529; 525's readers, packet 012)
    Reasoning He answers 'Faith, hope and love...' and 'infinite love embraced me and incorporated me into his body' (passage 534123). The chronology dates this sequence to 1929 (18443 'called, embraced, fused, and sent in 1929'; 18117 1929-06..1929-08; 7010; 18784, with the thirty years to 1959 in 16517). Some records tie the incorporation to 1959 (16661), which does not fit his own thirty-year count.
  35. before 1968 bound · possible
    Source Power Sent Me ¶46qualifying source passages 537347; telling lecture nids 1330
    Reasoning Qualifying passage ids [537347] belong to telling lecture nids [1330]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1968 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1968 is the MIN across telling lectures.
  36. before 16 February 1968 bound
    Source Power Sent Metelling lecture nid 1330, certain delivery 1968-02-16
    Why Tightens the phase4 L6a envelope from before 1968 to before 1968-02-16.
    Reasoning L6a envelope tightened to the telling day of nid 1330 (certain delivery 1968-02-16); same premise, finer precision. The phase4 L6a bound on this event is `before 1968`, an envelope over delivery YEARS computed without reading text. Its premise is that the fact is true by the time it is told; on that same premise the DAY of the telling is a strictly better upper bound. Nothing is re-decided — the bound is stated to the precision the evidence always supported. The delivery claim for 1968-02-16 on nid 1330 is held at `certain` by the corpus, which is what carries this claim. #2274; the L6a row stands beside this one.
  37. c. 1929 estimated · probable
    Source Power Sent Me ¶46
    Why M7 dating pass (529; 525's readers, packet 018)
    Reasoning The event's own description calls it a retelling of the same commission; the commission with the words 'Time to act' is dated 1929 (18443; 769, June-August 1929). The passage itself carries no year.
  38. before 1968 bound · possible
    Source Prophetic Sketches July 18 Marines Memorial Club San Francisco ¶14qualifying source passages 542736; telling lecture nids 1744
    Reasoning Qualifying passage ids [542736] belong to telling lecture nids [1744]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1968 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1968 is the MIN across telling lectures.
  39. before 18 July 1968 bound
    Source Prophetic Sketches July 18 Marines Memorial Club San Franciscotelling lecture nid 1744, certain delivery 1968-07-18
    Why Tightens the phase4 L6a envelope from before 1968 to before 1968-07-18.
    Reasoning L6a envelope tightened to the telling day of nid 1744 (certain delivery 1968-07-18); same premise, finer precision. The phase4 L6a bound on this event is `before 1968`, an envelope over delivery YEARS computed without reading text. Its premise is that the fact is true by the time it is told; on that same premise the DAY of the telling is a strictly better upper bound. Nothing is re-decided — the bound is stated to the precision the evidence always supported. The delivery claim for 1968-07-18 on nid 1744 is held at `certain` by the corpus, which is what carries this claim. #2274; the L6a row stands beside this one.
  40. c. 1929 estimated · probable
    Source Prophetic Sketches July 18 Marines Memorial Club San Francisco ¶14
    Why M7 dating pass (529; 525's readers, packet 020)
    Reasoning Passage 542736: embraced by Infinite Love, then commanded to go into the world and tell it; the chronology places that call and embrace in 1929 (18443, 16936, 7010).
  41. before 1969 bound · possible
    Source God Only Acts and Is ¶13qualifying source passages 545866; telling lecture nids 1828
    Reasoning Qualifying passage ids [545866] belong to telling lecture nids [1828]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1969 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1969 is the MIN across telling lectures.
  42. before 24 November 1969 bound
    Source God Only Acts and Istelling lecture nid 1828, certain delivery 1969-11-24
    Why Tightens the phase4 L6a envelope from before 1969 to before 1969-11-24.
    Reasoning L6a envelope tightened to the telling day of nid 1828 (certain delivery 1969-11-24); same premise, finer precision. The phase4 L6a bound on this event is `before 1969`, an envelope over delivery YEARS computed without reading text. Its premise is that the fact is true by the time it is told; on that same premise the DAY of the telling is a strictly better upper bound. Nothing is re-decided — the bound is stated to the precision the evidence always supported. The delivery claim for 1969-11-24 on nid 1828 is held at `certain` by the corpus, which is what carries this claim. #2274; the L6a row stands beside this one.
  43. before 20 March 1964 bound · probable
    Source God Only Acts and Is
    Why M7 dating pass (529; 525's readers, packet 027)
    Reasoning Lecture 1828 God Only Acts and Is: the 1969-11-24 delivery is refuted and 1964-03-20 (probable) leads (packet texts and told lines).
  44. between June 1929 and August 1929 estimated · probable
    Why M7 dating pass (529; 525's readers, packet 027)
    Reasoning Passage 545866: he is presented to the Ancient of Days as in Daniel 7, infinite might, a recording woman, and 'it is infinite love'. The chronology has this vision as 769, taken into the Divine Assembly, June-Aug 1929 (also 8872, 18784).
  45. before 1964 bound · possible
    Source A Confession of Faith ¶22qualifying source passages 546762; telling lecture nids 1851
    Reasoning Qualifying passage ids [546762] belong to telling lecture nids [1851]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1964 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1964 is the MIN across telling lectures.
  46. before 1 May 1964 bound
    Source A Confession of Faithtelling lecture nid 1851, certain delivery 1964-05-01
    Why Tightens the phase4 L6a envelope from before 1964 to before 1964-05-01.
    Reasoning L6a envelope tightened to the telling day of nid 1851 (certain delivery 1964-05-01); same premise, finer precision. The phase4 L6a bound on this event is `before 1964`, an envelope over delivery YEARS computed without reading text. Its premise is that the fact is true by the time it is told; on that same premise the DAY of the telling is a strictly better upper bound. Nothing is re-decided — the bound is stated to the precision the evidence always supported. The delivery claim for 1964-05-01 on nid 1851 is held at `certain` by the corpus, which is what carries this claim. #2274; the L6a row stands beside this one.
  47. c. 1929 estimated · possible
    Source A Confession of Faith ¶22
    Why M7 dating pass (529; 525's readers, packet 007)
    Reasoning The first he met was infinite might, who elsewhere 'sent' him (chronology 18065, 1926-29); 769 dates the Divine Assembly vision June-August 1929.
  48. c. 1935 stated · refuted
    Source Time to Act ¶4"thirty-odd years ago", told in Time to Act (nid 1236)
    Why pm-actor-525: CloudThree H006 (judge + check): 'Thirty-odd years ago' told in Time to Act (nid 1236, told about 1966) is a loose interval, not 1935. Read as 1966 minus 31 it gives 1935, but 37 years is also 'thirty odd'. It contradicts the dozens of explicit 1929 statements and the age-24 clues, and the same passage puts the room on 49th Street, consistent with 1929-30.
  49. 6 December 1959 stated · refuted
    Source Coming to Know the Only True God ¶19"the 6th day of December, l959", told in Coming to Know the Only True God (nid 1272)
    Why pm-actor-525: refuted by the M7 dating pass (529; 525's readers, packet 005): Describes David's later appearance five months after the 1959 birth-from-above ('the 6th day of December, l959...here stands David'), a distinct, later event narrated in the same lecture, not this event's 1929 vision.
  50. 1959 stated · refuted
    Source Many Mansions ¶35"back in 1959", told in Many Mansions (nid 1469)
    Why pm-actor-525: refuted by the M7 dating pass (529; 525's readers, packet 005): The quoted 'Time to act' line belongs to the 1929 Divine Assembly narrative itself (matches delta 8's passage 537344 and other 1929 tellings); the certain-1959 date appears misattributed, likely pulled from a different year mentioned elsewhere in the same lecture.
  51. c. 1915 stated · refuted
    Source Gods Purpose ¶17"thirty years before", told in Gods Purpose (nid 1946)
    Why pm-actor-525: refuted by the M7 dating pass (529; 525's readers, packet 005): The passage itself anchors 'thirty years before' to the stated 1959 birth from above ('before I experienced the birth from above on the 20th day of July in 1959, thirty years before'), which gives 1929, not 1915; the claim used the wrong anchor.
  52. 1959 stated · refuted
    Source "30 years later", told in The Invisible You (Unresolved ASR Witness) (nid 3988)
    Why pm-actor-525: refuted by the M7 dating pass (529; 525's readers, packet 005): '30 years later' in this telling refers to the later 1959 fulfillment/birth-from-above mentioned alongside the 1929 embrace, not to this event's own occurrence date.
Place
49th Street, New York City
Persons
Neville Goddard
David
Galileo
El Shaddai
Told / reported
  1. 1968 stated · probable · preferred
    Source Neville Goddard Research What Is The Divine Society
  2. 13 April 1965 stated
    Source The Marks of JesusThe Marks of Jesus (nid 101), telling 101-2, told 1965-04-13
  3. 31 January 1969 stated
    Source Predestined GloryPredestined Glory (nid 1035), telling 1035-0, told 1969-01-31
  4. 21 January 1964 stated
    Source The Supreme IdealThe Supreme Ideal (nid 1053), telling 1053-0, told 1964-01-21
  5. 1 March 1963 stated
    Source The Pure in HeartThe Pure in Heart (nid 1085), telling 1085-2, told 1963-03-01
  6. 16 January 1964 stated
    Source The Larger VentureThe Larger Venture (nid 1127), telling 1127-8, told 1964-01-16
  7. 26 May 1964 stated
    Source Call the Next WitnessCall the Next Witness (nid 1169), telling 1169-2, told 1964-05-26
  8. 1 December 1964 stated
    Source You Are My WitnessesYou Are My Witnesses (nid 1176), telling 1176-3, told 1964-12-01
Show all 68 claims
  1. 12 January 1965 stated
    Source Twenty-Seven HeavensTwenty-Seven Heavens (nid 1183), telling 1183-4, told 1965-01-12
  2. 19 January 1965 stated
    Source This My Name Forever I AmThis My Name Forever I Am (nid 1185), telling 1185-2, told 1965-01-19
  3. 4 May 1965 stated
    Source The Witness of the SpiritThe Witness of the Spirit (nid 1203), telling 1203-4, told 1965-05-04
  4. 3 April 1967 stated
    Source Coming to Know the Only True GodComing to Know the Only True God (nid 1272), telling 1272-4, told 1967-04-03
  5. 16 February 1968 stated
    Source Power Sent MePower Sent Me (nid 1330), telling 1330-9, told 1968-02-16
  6. 8 November 1968 stated
    Source The Knowledge of GodThe Knowledge of God (nid 1396), telling 1396-2, told 1968-11-08
  7. 15 November 1968 stated
    Source The Heavenly VisionThe Heavenly Vision (nid 1400), telling 1400-0, told 1968-11-15
  8. 10 January 1969 stated
    Source The Mystery of GraceThe Mystery of Grace (nid 1414), telling 1414-0, told 1969-01-10
  9. 10 March 1969 stated
    Source You Can Never Outgrow I AMYou Can Never Outgrow I AM (nid 1426), telling 1426-4, told 1969-03-10
  10. 2 June 1969 stated
    Source The Sphere WithinThe Sphere Within (nid 1458), telling 1458-7, told 1969-06-02
  11. 16 July 1969 stated
    Source Many MansionsMany Mansions (nid 1469), telling 1469-8, told 1969-07-16
  12. 10 October 1969 stated · doubtful
    Source ReconciliationReconciliation (nid 1487), telling 1487-0, told 1969-10-10
  13. 7 May 1971 stated
    Source Salvation History, Not Secular HistorySalvation History, Not Secular History (nid 1528), telling 1528-0, told 1971-05-07
  14. between 15 July 1968 and 15 July 1971 stated · possible
    Source Who Am I July 15 Marines Memorial Club San FranciscoWho Am I July 15 Marines Memorial Club San Francisco (nid 1756), telling 1756-3, told 1968-07-15/1971-07-15
  15. 10 April 1964 stated
    Source Be Master of the MoodBe Master of the Mood (nid 1834), telling 1834-8, told 1964-04-10
  16. 1 May 1964 stated
    Source A Confession of FaithA Confession of Faith (nid 1851), telling 1851-0, told 1964-05-01
  17. 28 May 1971 stated
    Source Experience ScriptureExperience Scripture (nid 1904), telling 1904-5, told 1971-05-28
  18. 25 September 1967 stated
    Source Test Yourself (nid 1921), telling 1921-3, told 1967-09-25
  19. 24 November 1963 stated · doubtful
    Source Advent: The Four TearsAdvent: The Four Tears (nid 2239), telling 2239-3, told 1963-11-24
  20. 30 January 1964 stated
    Source Now My Eye Sees TheeNow My Eye Sees Thee (nid 2253), telling 2253-0, told 1964-01-30
  21. 5 June 1970 stated · doubtful
    Source Q & As, July 1970Q & As, July 1970 (nid 3), telling 3-9, told 1970-06-05
  22. 20 September 1966 stated
    Source God Only ActsGod Only Acts (nid 30), telling 30-0, told 1966-09-20
  23. 15 February 1963 stated
    Source Moses Elijah JesusMoses Elijah Jesus (nid 2009), telling 2009-0, told 1963-02-15
  24. 5 June 1970 stated · doubtful
    Source Q & As, July 1970Q & As, July 1970 (nid 3), telling 3-9, told 1970-06-05
    Why Corrects the confidence of the told claim written by run `corpus v1 / phase3b` at delta 36 on this event; that claim is left standing per append-only. Ceiling rule #2132.
    Reasoning Confidence only; the date is not re-adjudicated and is left exactly as written. This claim is derived from the delivery claims of node 3 and asserts `certain`, but the strongest claim that node carries is `doubtful`, so there is nothing for `certain` to inherit from. nid 3 delivery claims: 1970-6-5 doubtful. Walked back to `doubtful`, the ceiling. Whether the DATE is right is a separate question this row does not touch; if the evidence turns out to support more confidence, it will have to come from a source other than this node.
  25. 30 September 1968 estimated
    Source I AM in Younid 1381 surviving delivery claim after refutation. All claims: 1968-9-30 certain; 1969-3-19 refuted; 1968-9-30 certain (preferred)
    Why Lane L7 (#2354) re-derivation. Supersedes in substance, not in storage, the refuted-date told claim(s) on this event; those rows stand per append-only.
    Reasoning Re-derived, not walked down. The existing told claim(s) on this event took their date from a delivery claim on node 1381 that the corpus has since REFUTED, so the corpus was asserting that Neville told this on a day it separately says he did not lecture. That is a contradiction rather than an over-confidence, and lowering the confidence would have hidden it instead of resolving it. The refutation stands and the told claim is the wrong side of it. Node 1381 surviving (non-refuted) claim: 1968-9-30 at `certain`. All claims on the node: 1968-9-30 certain; 1969-3-19 refuted; 1968-9-30 certain (preferred). Superseded here: delta 18: 1969-03-19 at `certain` (run `corpus v1 / phase3b`). The telling is dated by its lecture, so with the refuted date removed from consideration the surviving claim is what the telling inherits, at that claim own confidence and no higher.
  26. 11 June 1971 estimated · probable
    Source nid 1096 surviving delivery claim after refutation. All claims: 1963-4-9 refuted; 1971-6-11 probable (preferred)
    Why Lane L7 (#2354) re-derivation. Supersedes in substance, not in storage, the refuted-date told claim(s) on this event; those rows stand per append-only.
    Reasoning Re-derived, not walked down. The existing told claim(s) on this event took their date from a delivery claim on node 1096 that the corpus has since REFUTED, so the corpus was asserting that Neville told this on a day it separately says he did not lecture. That is a contradiction rather than an over-confidence, and lowering the confidence would have hidden it instead of resolving it. The refutation stands and the told claim is the wrong side of it. Node 1096 surviving (non-refuted) claim: 1971-6-11 at `probable`. All claims on the node: 1963-4-9 refuted; 1971-6-11 probable (preferred). Superseded here: delta 5: 1963-04-09 at `certain` (run `corpus v1 / phase3b`) | delta 39: 1963-04-09 at `probable` (run `v1.1/l4/ceiling/c2`). The telling is dated by its lecture, so with the refuted date removed from consideration the surviving claim is what the telling inherits, at that claim own confidence and no higher.
  27. 9 November 1965 estimated
    Source The New Mannid 1219 surviving delivery claim after refutation. All claims: 1965-11-9 certain; 1966-10-18 refuted; 1967-1-20 refuted; 1965-11-9 certain (preferred)
    Why Lane L7 (#2354) re-derivation. Supersedes in substance, not in storage, the refuted-date told claim(s) on this event; those rows stand per append-only.
    Reasoning Re-derived, not walked down. The existing told claim(s) on this event took their date from a delivery claim on node 1219 that the corpus has since REFUTED, so the corpus was asserting that Neville told this on a day it separately says he did not lecture. That is a contradiction rather than an over-confidence, and lowering the confidence would have hidden it instead of resolving it. The refutation stands and the told claim is the wrong side of it. Node 1219 surviving (non-refuted) claim: 1965-11-9 at `certain`. All claims on the node: 1965-11-9 certain; 1966-10-18 refuted; 1967-1-20 refuted; 1965-11-9 certain (preferred). Superseded here: delta 13: 1967-01-20 at `certain` (run `corpus v1 / phase3b`). The telling is dated by its lecture, so with the refuted date removed from consideration the surviving claim is what the telling inherits, at that claim own confidence and no higher.
  28. 16 February 1968 estimated
    Source Infinite Powernid 1329 surviving delivery claim after refutation. All claims: 1968-2-16 certain; 1969-9-18 refuted; 1968-2-16 certain (preferred)
    Why Lane L7 (#2354) re-derivation. Supersedes in substance, not in storage, the refuted-date told claim(s) on this event; those rows stand per append-only.
    Reasoning Re-derived, not walked down. The existing told claim(s) on this event took their date from a delivery claim on node 1329 that the corpus has since REFUTED, so the corpus was asserting that Neville told this on a day it separately says he did not lecture. That is a contradiction rather than an over-confidence, and lowering the confidence would have hidden it instead of resolving it. The refutation stands and the told claim is the wrong side of it. Node 1329 surviving (non-refuted) claim: 1968-2-16 at `certain`. All claims on the node: 1968-2-16 certain; 1969-9-18 refuted; 1968-2-16 certain (preferred). Superseded here: delta 16: 1969-09-18 at `certain` (run `corpus v1 / phase3b`). The telling is dated by its lecture, so with the refuted date removed from consideration the surviving claim is what the telling inherits, at that claim own confidence and no higher.
  29. 18 November 1968 estimated · probable
    Source Test Yourselvesnid 1466 surviving delivery claim after refutation. All claims: 1969-6-23 refuted; 1968-11-18 probable (preferred)
    Why Lane L7 (#2354) re-derivation. Supersedes in substance, not in storage, the refuted-date told claim(s) on this event; those rows stand per append-only.
    Reasoning Re-derived, not walked down. The existing told claim(s) on this event took their date from a delivery claim on node 1466 that the corpus has since REFUTED, so the corpus was asserting that Neville told this on a day it separately says he did not lecture. That is a contradiction rather than an over-confidence, and lowering the confidence would have hidden it instead of resolving it. The refutation stands and the told claim is the wrong side of it. Node 1466 surviving (non-refuted) claim: 1968-11-18 at `probable`. All claims on the node: 1969-6-23 refuted; 1968-11-18 probable (preferred). Superseded here: delta 24: 1969-06-23 at `certain` (run `corpus v1 / phase3b`) | delta 40: 1969-06-23 at `probable` (run `v1.1/l4/ceiling/c2`). The telling is dated by its lecture, so with the refuted date removed from consideration the surviving claim is what the telling inherits, at that claim own confidence and no higher.
  30. 30 November 1965 estimated · probable
    Source Adventnid 1175 surviving delivery claim after refutation. All claims: 1964-11-27 refuted; 1964-11-27 refuted; 1965-12-13 refuted; 1965-11-30 probable (preferred)
    Why Lane L7 (#2354) re-derivation. Supersedes in substance, not in storage, the refuted-date told claim(s) on this event; those rows stand per append-only.
    Reasoning Re-derived, not walked down. The existing told claim(s) on this event took their date from a delivery claim on node 1175 that the corpus has since REFUTED, so the corpus was asserting that Neville told this on a day it separately says he did not lecture. That is a contradiction rather than an over-confidence, and lowering the confidence would have hidden it instead of resolving it. The refutation stands and the told claim is the wrong side of it. Node 1175 surviving (non-refuted) claim: 1965-11-30 at `probable`. All claims on the node: 1964-11-27 refuted; 1964-11-27 refuted; 1965-12-13 refuted; 1965-11-30 probable (preferred). Superseded here: delta 8: 1965-12-13 at `certain` (run `corpus v1 / phase3b`). The telling is dated by its lecture, so with the refuted date removed from consideration the surviving claim is what the telling inherits, at that claim own confidence and no higher.
  31. 1 February 1966 estimated
    Source Time to Actnid 1236 surviving delivery claim after refutation. All claims: 1966-2-1 certain (preferred); 1967-1-16 refuted
    Why Lane L7 (#2354) re-derivation. Supersedes in substance, not in storage, the refuted-date told claim(s) on this event; those rows stand per append-only.
    Reasoning Re-derived, not walked down. The existing told claim(s) on this event took their date from a delivery claim on node 1236 that the corpus has since REFUTED, so the corpus was asserting that Neville told this on a day it separately says he did not lecture. That is a contradiction rather than an over-confidence, and lowering the confidence would have hidden it instead of resolving it. The refutation stands and the told claim is the wrong side of it. Node 1236 surviving (non-refuted) claim: 1966-2-1 at `certain`. All claims on the node: 1966-2-1 certain (preferred); 1967-1-16 refuted. Superseded here: delta 14: 1967-01-16 at `certain` (run `corpus v1 / phase3b`). The telling is dated by its lecture, so with the refuted date removed from consideration the surviving claim is what the telling inherits, at that claim own confidence and no higher.
  32. 28 April 1969 estimated · probable
    Source nid 1144 surviving delivery claim after refutation. All claims: 1964-2-21 refuted; 1967-3-10 refuted; 1969-4-28 probable (preferred)
    Why Lane L7 (#2354) re-derivation. Supersedes in substance, not in storage, the refuted-date told claim(s) on this event; those rows stand per append-only.
    Reasoning Re-derived, not walked down. The existing told claim(s) on this event took their date from a delivery claim on node 1144 that the corpus has since REFUTED, so the corpus was asserting that Neville told this on a day it separately says he did not lecture. That is a contradiction rather than an over-confidence, and lowering the confidence would have hidden it instead of resolving it. The refutation stands and the told claim is the wrong side of it. Node 1144 surviving (non-refuted) claim: 1969-4-28 at `probable`. All claims on the node: 1964-2-21 refuted; 1967-3-10 refuted; 1969-4-28 probable (preferred). Superseded here: delta 0: 1967-03-10 at `certain` (run `corpus v1 / phase3b`) | delta 1: 1967-03-10 at `probable` (run `v1.1/l4/ceiling/c2`). The telling is dated by its lecture, so with the refuted date removed from consideration the surviving claim is what the telling inherits, at that claim own confidence and no higher.
  33. 28 April 1969 estimated
    Source nid 1950 surviving delivery claim after refutation. All claims: 1970-6-22 refuted; 1969-4-28 probable; 1969-4-28 certain (preferred)
    Why Lane L7 (#2354) re-derivation. Supersedes in substance, not in storage, the refuted-date told claim(s) on this event; those rows stand per append-only.
    Reasoning Re-derived, not walked down. The existing told claim(s) on this event took their date from a delivery claim on node 1950 that the corpus has since REFUTED, so the corpus was asserting that Neville told this on a day it separately says he did not lecture. That is a contradiction rather than an over-confidence, and lowering the confidence would have hidden it instead of resolving it. The refutation stands and the told claim is the wrong side of it. Node 1950 surviving (non-refuted) claim: 1969-4-28 at `certain`. All claims on the node: 1970-6-22 refuted; 1969-4-28 probable; 1969-4-28 certain (preferred). Superseded here: delta 0: 1970-06-22 at `certain` (run `corpus v1 / phase3b`). The telling is dated by its lecture, so with the refuted date removed from consideration the surviving claim is what the telling inherits, at that claim own confidence and no higher.
  34. 1971 stated
    Source InvisibleInvisible (nid 1981), telling 1981-5, told 1971
  35. 1971 estimated
    Source InvisibleInvisible, node 1981; sole carrier delivery claim is year 1971 exact/certain.
    Reasoning This event is told in node 1981, whose sole delivery claim is 1971 exact/certain. A told date inherited from a carrier node is typed estimated even when the underlying delivery claim is stated. The existing told row has the supported year and confidence but is typed stated, so this append-only row supersedes it in semantic type. The occurrence range was established independently from passage 550792 and did not consume this delivery anchor.
  36. 1971 estimated
    Source passage 556544 (lecture nid 3988 'The Invisible You'), delivery claim d0 exact year 1971/certain (12-years-after-1959 internal dating + independent catalog match)
    Reasoning Passage 556544 is Neville narrating directly the moment thirty years after his 1929 union, at age 54 in San Francisco, when the whole scriptural story began erupting and unfolding within him. The lecture containing this passage, nid 3988, has only one delivery claim, a certain, year-only exact date (1971, from Neville placing his 1959 awakening as twelve years earlier, corroborated by independent title-matched audio catalogs). No month or day is given by any evidence, so the telling inherits that same year-only precision and certain confidence.
  37. after 1965 estimated · probable
    Source delivery bound on lecture nid 2001
    Reasoning The telling belongs to nid 2001, whose only supported delivery claim is after 1965 at probable confidence.
  38. 28 April 1972 stated
    Source ConsummationConsummation (nid 1539), telling 1539-0, told 1972-04-28
  39. 16 June 1959 estimated
    Source The Cup and the Cross
    Reasoning Neville narrates the commissioning story in first person within lecture 1057 ('The Cup and the Cross', passage 529061), so the telling date is that lecture's own delivery date. That date, 1959-06-16, is independently corroborated by two agreeing claims (catalog #102 and a site byline chrome dateline), both certain with no conflict between them -- the weakest link here is solid, so 'certain' carries the real strength rather than laundering it. || v1.1 type repair: written as `stated` by run v1.1/l4/actor417/6000-6999-b1, retyped `estimated` — the claim cites node 1057, not a passage, so it is this lane's inference rather than something Neville said in so many words (#2117).
  40. 1 March 1971 stated · doubtful
    Source God's Law and His PromiseGod's Law and His Promise (nid 1021), telling 1021-3, told 1971-03-01
  41. 16 June 1959 stated
    Source The Cup and the CrossThe Cup and the Cross (nid 1057), telling 1057-0, told 1959-06-16
  42. 4 December 1965 stated · doubtful
    Source The State of PaulThe State of Paul (nid 1226), telling 1226-10, told 1965-12-04
  43. 7 December 1965 estimated · probable
    Source The State of Pauldelivery claim d1 on lecture nid 1226, chrome dateline '12/7/65' (v1.1/l2/w1), probable and preferred
    Reasoning The event is recounted within this lecture, so the telling date is the lecture's delivery date; the lecture's own passage has Neville tell the audience the series reopens 'January the 4th, a Tuesday', making Tuesday the series' regular night, and 1965-12-07 (a Tuesday) fits that while the catalogue's 1965-12-04 (a Saturday) does not -- this corrected told claim is added beside the existing rows rather than altering them.
  44. 24 January 1966 stated
    Source Everyone Has the Plan in HimEveryone Has the Plan in Him (nid 1234), telling 1234-4, told 1966-01-24
  45. 18 July 1968 stated
    Source Prophetic Sketches July 18 Marines Memorial Club San FranciscoProphetic Sketches July 18 Marines Memorial Club San Francisco (nid 1744), telling 1744-3, told 1968-07-18
  46. 20 March 1964 estimated · probable
    Source God Only Acts and Isnid 1828 surviving delivery claim after refutation. All claims: 1969-11-24 refuted; 1964-3-20 probable (preferred)
    Why Lane L7 (#2354) re-derivation. Supersedes in substance, not in storage, the refuted-date told claim(s) on this event; those rows stand per append-only.
    Reasoning Re-derived, not walked down. The existing told claim(s) on this event took their date from a delivery claim on node 1828 that the corpus has since REFUTED, so the corpus was asserting that Neville told this on a day it separately says he did not lecture. That is a contradiction rather than an over-confidence, and lowering the confidence would have hidden it instead of resolving it. The refutation stands and the told claim is the wrong side of it. Node 1828 surviving (non-refuted) claim: 1964-3-20 at `probable`. All claims on the node: 1969-11-24 refuted; 1964-3-20 probable (preferred). Superseded here: delta 0: 1969-11-24 at `certain` (run `corpus v1 / phase3b`). The telling is dated by its lecture, so with the refuted date removed from consideration the surviving claim is what the telling inherits, at that claim own confidence and no higher.
  47. 9 April 1963 stated · refuted
    Source Who Is the Real Messiah (nid 1096), telling 1096-1, told 1963-04-09
    Reasoning || v1.1/l7/told-close: the delivery claim this was derived from (nid 1096, 1963-4-9) was refuted by the L7 adjudication (#2363). The corrected told claim from the same lecture stands at 1971-6-11. This row is retired rather than deleted so the derivation history remains readable.
  48. 13 December 1965 stated · refuted
    Source AdventAdvent (nid 1175), telling 1175-1, told 1965-12-13
    Reasoning || v1.1/l7/told-close: the delivery claim this was derived from (nid 1175, 1965-12-13) was refuted by the L7 adjudication (#2363). The corrected told claim from the same lecture stands at 1965-11-30. This row is retired rather than deleted so the derivation history remains readable.
  49. 20 January 1967 stated · refuted
    Source The New ManThe New Man (nid 1219), telling 1219-3, told 1967-01-20
    Reasoning || v1.1/l7/told-close: the delivery claim this was derived from (nid 1219, 1967-1-20) was refuted by the L7 adjudication (#2363). The corrected told claim from the same lecture stands at 1965-11-9. This row is retired rather than deleted so the derivation history remains readable.
  50. 16 January 1967 stated · refuted
    Source Time to ActTime to Act (nid 1236), telling 1236-0, told 1967-01-16
    Reasoning || v1.1/l7/told-close: the delivery claim this was derived from (nid 1236, 1967-1-16) was refuted by the L7 adjudication (#2363). The corrected told claim from the same lecture stands at 1966-2-1. This row is retired rather than deleted so the derivation history remains readable.
  51. 18 September 1969 stated · refuted
    Source Infinite PowerInfinite Power (nid 1329), telling 1329-0, told 1969-09-18
    Reasoning || v1.1/l7/told-close: the delivery claim this was derived from (nid 1329, 1969-9-18) was refuted by the L7 adjudication (#2363). The corrected told claim from the same lecture stands at 1968-2-16. This row is retired rather than deleted so the derivation history remains readable.
  52. 19 March 1969 stated · refuted
    Source I AM in YouI AM in You (nid 1381), telling 1381-1, told 1969-03-19
    Reasoning || v1.1/l7/told-close: the delivery claim this was derived from (nid 1381, 1969-3-19) was refuted by the L7 adjudication (#2363). The corrected told claim from the same lecture stands at 1968-9-30. This row is retired rather than deleted so the derivation history remains readable.
  53. 23 June 1969 stated · refuted
    Source Test YourselvesTest Yourselves (nid 1466), telling 1466-6, told 1969-06-23
    Reasoning || v1.1/l7/told-close: the delivery claim this was derived from (nid 1466, 1969-6-23) was refuted by the L7 adjudication (#2363). The corrected told claim from the same lecture stands at 1968-11-18. This row is retired rather than deleted so the derivation history remains readable.
  54. 1972 stated · refuted
    Source The Pattern ManThe Pattern Man (nid 2183), telling 2183-1, told 1972
    Reasoning || v1.1/l7/told-close: the delivery claim this was derived from (nid 2183, 1972--) was refuted by the L7 adjudication (#2363). The corrected told claim from the same lecture stands at 1968-7-17. This row is retired rather than deleted so the derivation history remains readable.
  55. 9 April 1963 stated · refuted
    Source Who Is the Real Messiah (nid 1096), telling 1096-1, told 1963-04-09
    Why Corrects the confidence of the told claim written by run `corpus v1 / phase3b` at delta 5 on this event; that claim is left standing per append-only. Ceiling rule #2132.
    Reasoning Confidence only; the date is not re-adjudicated and is left exactly as written. This claim is derived from the delivery claims of node 1096 and asserts `certain`, but the strongest claim that node carries is `probable`, so there is nothing for `certain` to inherit from. nid 1096 delivery claims: 1963-4-9 possible; 1971-6-11 probable. Walked back to `probable`, the ceiling. Whether the DATE is right is a separate question this row does not touch; if the evidence turns out to support more confidence, it will have to come from a source other than this node. || v1.1/l7/told-close: the delivery claim this was derived from (nid 1096, 1963-4-9) was refuted by the L7 adjudication (#2363). The corrected told claim from the same lecture stands at 1971-6-11. This row is retired rather than deleted so the derivation history remains readable.
  56. 23 June 1969 stated · refuted
    Source Test YourselvesTest Yourselves (nid 1466), telling 1466-6, told 1969-06-23
    Why Corrects the confidence of the told claim written by run `corpus v1 / phase3b` at delta 24 on this event; that claim is left standing per append-only. Ceiling rule #2132.
    Reasoning Confidence only; the date is not re-adjudicated and is left exactly as written. This claim is derived from the delivery claims of node 1466 and asserts `certain`, but the strongest claim that node carries is `probable`, so there is nothing for `certain` to inherit from. nid 1466 delivery claims: 1969-6-23 doubtful; 1968-11-18 probable. Walked back to `probable`, the ceiling. Whether the DATE is right is a separate question this row does not touch; if the evidence turns out to support more confidence, it will have to come from a source other than this node. || v1.1/l7/told-close: the delivery claim this was derived from (nid 1466, 1969-6-23) was refuted by the L7 adjudication (#2363). The corrected told claim from the same lecture stands at 1968-11-18. This row is retired rather than deleted so the derivation history remains readable.
  57. 17 July 1968 estimated · refuted
    Source The Pattern Mannid 2183 surviving delivery claim after refutation. All claims: 1956-??-?? refuted; 1958-10-6 refuted; 1964-3-9 refuted; 1968-7-17 certain; 1969-5-12 refuted; 1969-10-15 refuted; 1971-3-15 refuted; 1972-??-?? refuted; 1968-7-17 certain (preferred)
    Why Lane L7 (#2354) re-derivation. Supersedes in substance, not in storage, the refuted-date told claim(s) on this event; those rows stand per append-only.
    Reasoning Re-derived, not walked down. The existing told claim(s) on this event took their date from a delivery claim on node 2183 that the corpus has since REFUTED, so the corpus was asserting that Neville told this on a day it separately says he did not lecture. That is a contradiction rather than an over-confidence, and lowering the confidence would have hidden it instead of resolving it. The refutation stands and the told claim is the wrong side of it. Node 2183 surviving (non-refuted) claim: 1968-7-17 at `certain`. All claims on the node: 1956-??-?? refuted; 1958-10-6 refuted; 1964-3-9 refuted; 1968-7-17 certain; 1969-5-12 refuted; 1969-10-15 refuted; 1971-3-15 refuted; 1972-??-?? refuted; 1968-7-17 certain (preferred). Superseded here: delta 33: 1972-00-00 at `certain` (run `corpus v1 / phase3b`). The telling is dated by its lecture, so with the refuted date removed from consideration the surviving claim is what the telling inherits, at that claim own confidence and no higher.
  58. 10 March 1967 stated · refuted
    Source A Riddle (nid 1144), telling 1144-7, told 1967-03-10
    Reasoning || v1.1/l7/told-close: the delivery claim this was derived from (nid 1144, 1967-3-10) was refuted by the L7 adjudication (#2363). The corrected told claim from the same lecture stands at 1969-4-28. This row is retired rather than deleted so the derivation history remains readable.
  59. 22 June 1970 stated · refuted
    Source A Riddle (nid 1950), telling 1950-6, told 1970-06-22
    Reasoning || v1.1/l7/told-close: the delivery claim this was derived from (nid 1950, 1970-6-22) was refuted by the L7 adjudication (#2363). The corrected told claim from the same lecture stands at 1969-4-28. This row is retired rather than deleted so the derivation history remains readable.
  60. 24 November 1969 stated · refuted
    Source God Only Acts and IsGod Only Acts and Is (nid 1828), telling 1828-1, told 1969-11-24
    Reasoning || v1.1/l7/told-close: the delivery claim this was derived from (nid 1828, 1969-11-24) was refuted by the L7 adjudication (#2363). The corrected told claim from the same lecture stands at 1964-3-20. This row is retired rather than deleted so the derivation history remains readable.
Sources

Source

  • Neville Goddard Research What Is The Divine Society ¶8 (back thirty years before it happened, back in 1929, I was taken in spirit into the Divine Assembly)
  • Predestined Glory ¶4 ("when I was 24" (lecture, 1969))
  • The Heavenly Vision ¶15 ("when I was twenty-four in 1929" (lecture, 1968))
  • The Marks of Jesus ¶45 (In my own experience it was the word of Paul that I answered when the risen Christ asked me to name the greatest thing in the world. From Corinthians, the 13th chapter of 1st Corinthians, I answered, “Faith, hope and love, these three abide; but the grea…)
  • Predestined Glory ¶4 (When I was 24, I went to sleep perfectly normally, as I do today, and during the night I was taken in Spirit into the Divine Assembly, and I was taken into the presence of a Recording Angel. And here sat this heavenly being . . a desk at a slant, with a …)
  • The Supreme Ideal ¶19 (I looked upon this world…and I stopped it. Everything froze, as though they were all made of clay; then I started it, and it moved on. I stopped it, and it stopped. I discovered then, not a thing in this world was independent of my perception of it.)
  • The Pure in Heart ¶18 (While I was in that state where I was incapable of stealing, but incapable of stealing, and I could not deceive for personal gain, one night, taken in Spirit right into the presence of the Ancient of Days, he asked me the eternal question, “What is the g…)
  • Jehovahs Messiah (Unresolved ASR Witness) ¶22 (And here, he embraces you and you fuse as though you took a drop of water and dropped it into a bowl of water. It disappears in it without loss of identity. It becomes the bowl, and yet it is still individualized. I did not cease to be aware that I am th…)
  • The Larger Venture ¶23 (Because I stood in the presence of God and God is man: It is yourself personified.)
  • Call the Next Witness ¶8 (I was asked the question, “What is the greatest thing in the world?” and my answer came from the Book of Corinthians, Paul’s letter to the Corinthians, the 13th chapter, “Faith, hope and love, these three, but the greatest of these is love.”)
  • Advent ¶16 (I stood in the presence of the risen Christ, and here it’s man. I had but one emotion permeating my whole being and it’s love.)
  • You Are My Witnesses ¶12 (for I was taken in Spirit into that divine council and stood in the presence of the Ancient of Days, infinite love. Infinite love asked me a very simple question, “What is the greatest thing in the world?” and I answered, “Faith, hope and love, these thr…)
  • Twenty-Seven Heavens ¶13 (I’m speaking from experience, I am not speculating. I was taken this night in Spirit into the presence of the risen Christ, infinite love, but infinite love! That’s the form that he wears.)
  • This My Name Forever I Am ¶19 (I saw it so clearly when I was a lad in my twenties, taken into the divine society, and the first one I encountered was infinite might, sheer might, not a shred of mercy in his presence, no peace, no love.)
  • The Witness of the Spirit ¶21 (I was taken in Spirit into the presence of the risen Christ, and all that I could see as I stood in the presence of the being that is man was infinite love.)
  • The New Man ¶32 (But they don’t confuse me any more, because I stood in the presence of the risen Christ, and when he asked the simple question, which I answered that the greatest thing in the world is love, he embraced me.)
  • Time to Act ¶4 (With this I was whisked out, and there I found myself back in my room, hotel room on 49th Street.)
  • Coming to Know the Only True God ¶19 (David comes five months later. In my case, the 6th day of December, l959. And here on the morning of the 6th of December my head explodes, and here stands David, and I am the Ancient of Days.)
  • Infinite Power ¶2 (Power took me to stand in the presence of the Risen Lord. Wearing the Human Form Divine, He embraced me and incorporated me into his body of Infinite Love. Wearing his body of love, I stood before Almighty God who said: “Time to act.” Then I was sent bac…)
  • Power Sent Me ¶43 (may I tell you, the night I was taken into the divine assembly that’s how they all were dressed, all wore capes. I can’t tell you why, but they all wore capes.)
  • I AM in You ¶8 (Well, in my case I was taken into his presence. I did not know that night would be such a night. But here, I am taken in spirit into the presence of the risen Lord; and strangely enough, when he asked me a question, the answer had to be in terms of the w…)
  • The Knowledge of God ¶41 (Well now, in my case, I seemed to have had no choice in the matter, for I was taken in spirit into his presence, and when he asked me to name the greatest thing in the world, without hesitation I said love.)
  • The Heavenly Vision ¶15 (Because at that age, when I was twenty-four in 1929, and I knew nothing of the mysteries, so I wondered what on earth has happened this night? Yet my room…there was no reason for it, no moonlight, no light from outside, it’s four in the morning, and my r…)
  • The Mystery of Grace ¶2 (I was taken first to the recording angel and there she checked off my name written in the book of life. Then I was taken before the risen Lord and he asked a simple question, asked me to name the greatest thing in the world. I quoted from the works of Pa…)
  • You Can Never Outgrow I AM ¶23 (He who sent me is one with me, for although he seemed to be another when I stood in his presence, when we embraced we fused and became one.)
  • The Sphere Within ¶26 (When I returned from the vision of being incorporated into the body of love, if the worldly wise men had forced me – like they did Galileo – I, too, would deny it, yet knowing I am right and they are stupid.)
  • Test Yourselves ¶49 (But power did send me with the command “Time to act.” So I must tell of the power of God and this is the creative power. But I tell you, love came first.)
  • Many Mansions ¶35 (I looked into his eyes and he didn’t move his throat . . didn’t move his lips . . but I heard every word that he thought as he looked into my eyes. He looked into my eyes and thought, and his thought was: “Time to act.”)
  • Reconciliation ¶5 (But I cannot describe the feeling that possessed me when I stood in the presence of infinite love and felt his embrace. At that moment of incorporation I knew myself to be love and although others cannot see it, I wear the body of love.)
  • Salvation History, Not Secular History ¶9 (When I stood in the presence of the Risen Lord, after having seen my Angelic Being check off my name, look at me and the book and then simply check the name – the registered name – it’s there in the book. This is the time now. Then standing in His presen…)
  • Who Am I July 15 Marines Memorial Club San Francisco ¶7 (When I was sent to do the work I am doing, it was Power who commanded me. I was first embraced by Infinite Love, and I fused with him; but while I’m one with Love and it’s Man, the Risen Lord I was taken before a being who was Infinite Power.)
  • Be Master of the Mood ¶33 (But I tell you, I know from experience not only there’s God but God is love, infinite love, so you can always approach him.)
  • A Confession of Faith ¶13 (I only saw what I’m now describing. I saw this angelic being sitting at a desk with a quill pen, an open book, and here was motion.)
  • The Head, the Source ¶9 (So I can tell you I stood in his presence and I knew it was the Lord. I saw his form, it was a man, and I conversed with him as man to man. His appearance was the likeness and similitude of love. At that moment he incorporated me…one with the one body…fo…)
  • Experience Scripture ¶26 (As I stood before him, I could not think of anything but Love, and he asked me, “What is the greatest thing in the world?” and I answered, “Love.”)
  • The Two Sides This Teaching ¶16 (When I was taken into the divine society, it was love that first embraced me, then it was power that sent me, but love first embraced me.)
  • The Riddle ¶30 (I was taken straight into the presence of the risen Christ. I didn’t turn around. Had I turned around, I would not be here. I was taken into his presence, answered the questions asked, and incorporated into his body that I may complete the journey.)
  • Gods Purpose ¶17 (Before I experienced the birth from above on the 20th day of July in 1959, thirty years before, I was set upon and called into the Divine Council. And when my name was checked off in the register, I was taken into the presence of the Ancient of Days—God …)
  • Signs End July 26 Marines Memorial Club San Francisco ¶21 (As I stood in His Presence, He asked me the simplest question in the world: “What is the greatest thing in the world?” And I answered in the words of Paul: “Faith, hope and love, these three, but the greatest of these is love.” At that moment, Infinite L…)
  • Test Yourself Realneville ¶16 (Well, many years ago, the year 1929, I was taken in Spirit into the divine assembly, where the gods hold judgment. And here, my first encounter was with El Shaddai, God personified as infinite might.)
  • The Pattern Man ¶25 (At the moment, I did not know why I was sent. I only knew I was sent. Then came the experience thirty years later.)
  • Advent: The Four Tears ¶16 (And yet I stood in the presence of “the human form divine” and it was infinite love. Infinite love embraced me and incorporated me into the form of infinite love.)
  • Now My Eye Sees Thee ¶4 (And when I was embraced into the body of God, and made one with God, and wore his body as my own body, and then sent, the words ringing in my ear were these, “Down with the blue bloods.” I came back unschooled, uneducated, wondering what is it all about?)
  • Q & As, July 1970 ¶25 (I was commanded to clear from my own mind’s eye all external worship.)
  • God Only Acts ¶10 (I was sound asleep in my hotel room in New York City when I was taken in Spirit into this divine council.)
  • Moses Elijah Jesus ¶10 (Thirty odd years ago I was taken in the spirit into a divine council, a divine society, and the first one to meet me was the embodiment of infinite might. He was seated (and the symbolism is perfect) in a chariot, and hitched to this chariot was this per…)
  • The Riddle ¶30 (I was sent into the presence of the Risen Christ. I didn’t turn around. Had I turned around I would not be here. I was sent into his presence to answer the question asked of me, then to be incorporated into his body, that I may complete the journey.)
  • Invisible ¶30 (It is 1929, all right, so I was 24. After 30, and finally, 54. It was when I was 54 years of age, in the city of San Francisco, that the whole thing began to erupt and unfold within me, because “He was about 30 years of age.”)
  • Invisible ¶29 (It was 1929, all right — so I was 24. Come to 30, you find me 54. It was when I was 54 years of age, in the city of San Francisco, that the whole thing began to erupt and unfold within me.)
  • Predestined Glory ¶3 (this month back in 1929)
  • Call Upon Self ¶18 (But then came the fulfillment of the promise, when he called me in 1929, embraced me, I fused with him, and then he sent me.)
  • Consummation ¶10 (When the risen Lord embraced me and sent me, and the words were “down with the blue bloods,” meaning protocols, church protocols, all these extraneous things that keep from man the truth that God will reveal to man, all ceremonies, all rituals, all these…)
  • Heirs to the Universe ¶28 (When God embraced me, he was a father, he was love, he was power, he was wisdom. And as he embraced me and I fused with him, for then he transferred to me all that he is, that was his gift to me, that was his grace upon me. He gave me fatherhood.)
  • God's Law and His Promise ¶43 (The question asked me was based upon love, “What is the greatest thing in the world?” and I answered “Love,” and at that we fused.)
  • The Cup and the Cross ¶5 (Years ago I was sent to do this work that I am doing. I was told, “Go! And down with the blue-bloods!”)
  • The State of Paul ¶68 (In my own case, I quoted the last verse of 13th Corinthians when I stood in the presence of the risen Christ.)
  • Everyone Has the Plan in Him ¶25 (So when I was asked, “What is the greatest thing in the world?” my automatic answer—as though I was divinely prompted, I didn’t stop for one second to answer—“Faith, hope and love, these three; but the greatest of these is love” . And then infinite love …)
  • Power Sent Me ¶46 (I was sent by sheer might. He didn’t open his lips, he didn’t use any vocal chords, he simply thought the words and I heard them. The words were, “Time to act!” That was the emphasis.)
  • Prophetic Sketches July 18 Marines Memorial Club San Francisco ¶14 (And strangely enough, the night that I stood in the presence of Infinite Love, when He embraced me, and then I heard the cry “out of the blue”; and then I found myself before Might – sheer Almightiness; and He wore, as she saw me wearing it, an Inverness…)
  • God Only Acts and Is ¶13 (In my own case, it was just as described in the 7th chapter in the Book of Daniel, the Ancient of Days, right before me. Clothed as he’s clothed, looking just as he’s described, and I’m presented to him as described in that book.)
  • A Confession of Faith ¶22 (The first one that I saw was the embodiment of infinite might, but a man. I felt in his presence that if he desired he could destroy the earth.)