Neville gives a five-lesson course in February 1948

Date (happened)
between 2 February 1948 and 6 February 1948
probable
  1. between 2 February 1948 and 6 February 1948 conclusion · probable
    Why dc1-agreement-20261004, pm-actor-551 (PM 8702)
    Reasoning All 2 claims agree on 1948-02-02–1948-02-06: derived from the event's own title: "Neville gives a five-lesson course in Febru; node:1802.
  2. between 2 February 1948 and 6 February 1948 estimated · probable · preferred
    Source Consciousness Is the Only Realitylecture nid 1802 delivery claim d0 (catalog #1, certain, 1948-02-02), corroborated by chrome dateline d1 (bare '1948', possible), plus passage 544849 ('this week in these five lessons') and the lecture's own processing notes ('ends Friday')
    Reasoning The lecture's own delivery date is certain (1948-02-02, catalogue #1), independently consistent with a bare-year '1948' chrome dateline recovered from the transcript head. The event's witness (passage 544849, r0) frames this lecture as the first of 'this week in these five lessons'; the lecture's processing notes record the course running through Friday. 2 February 1948 computes to a Monday (Doomsday algorithm: 1948's doomsday is Sunday 29 February; counting back 27 days to the 2nd lands on Monday), so a Monday-Friday five-lesson week runs 1948-02-02 to 1948-02-06, matching the 'ends Friday' note. Capped at probable rather than certain because the week's end date is not itself printed in the text but inferred from the course's known Monday-Friday structure; this supersedes the earlier title-derived month-only placeholder with the specific week the underlying evidence actually supports.
  3. February 1948 stated · probable
    Source derived from the event's own title: "Neville gives a five-lesson course in February 1948"
    Reasoning The event held NO date claim of any kind; its own title states 1948-02 (month precision, parsed as "month year"). ⚠ A title in this corpus is a DERIVED artefact — an earlier pass wrote it from the passage text — so this claim is title-derived and is marked as such rather than cited as a source document; the underlying text remains the real evidence and would supersede it. Confidence `probable`, never `certain`, for that reason. Precision is never inflated beyond the title's own wording. CALIBRATION (run v1.1/l1.4/titledate, against the 489 events that already hold an independent preferred date): day 96.1%, month 94.1% agreement. Titles naming a REFERENCE event rather than the event itself ("before", "after", "during the week of", "per ... lecture") are refused outright and never reach this write — reading an anchor as the date is the same laundering phase3b committed when it wrote telling dates onto events.
Place
Persons