Neville's mother dies

Neville recounts that his mother died in 1941, after which his father never remarried.

Place: Barbados

Person: Neville Goddard

Date (happened)
1941
unresolved
  1. 1941 stated · preferred
    Source Believe It In ¶11"1941", told in Believe It (nid 1859)
  2. 1941 stated
    Source The Divine Body ¶30passage 528443 (lecture nid 1036), 'Mother died in 41'; corroborated by passage 547091
    Reasoning Neville explicitly states that his mother died in 1941; passage 547091 independently repeats that she left the family in 1941. No month or day is asserted.
  3. c. November 1941 stated · probable
    Reasoning Passage 553779 has Neville say plainly that his mother died 'back in 1941, ... just about a month before Pearl Harbor.' The attack on Pearl Harbor was 1941-12-07, so 'about a month before' places her death at circa November 1941.
  4. between 19 February 1966 and 18 February 1967 stated · probable
    Source He Supplies the Spirit in Us ¶25"at the age of sixty-one", told in He Supplies the Spirit in Us (nid 1312)
  5. before 1969 bound · possible
    Source The Promise's Fulfillment in You ¶7qualifying source passages 540761; telling lecture nids 1474
    Reasoning Qualifying passage ids [540761] belong to telling lecture nids [1474]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1969 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1969 is the MIN across telling lectures.
  6. c. 1941 estimated · probable
    Source corpus anchor: Neville's mother dies, 1941 (hist_event 5960, certain)
    Why The existing 1966-1967 between-range is left standing per append-only; it is contradicted by the corpus's own certain 1941 anchor and should not be relied on.
    Reasoning The existing d0 'between 1966-02-19 and 1967-02-18' claim equals Neville's own birth date (1905-02-19, hist_event 950) plus 61 years exactly, showing it misapplied Neville's age-anchor to a passage describing his MOTHER dying 'at the age of sixty-one' -- her own birth year is not given anywhere in the packet, so her age cannot be turned into a date this way. The corpus already carries her death at 1941 (certain, hist_event 5960), which this event's own description (bore twelve children, died of cancer) plainly narrates the same death. Confidence is capped at probable because equating this event with hist_event 5960 is an inference I cannot verify against that event's own witnesses, which are outside this packet.
  7. between 1941 and 1959 stated · refuted
    Source Creation and Faith ¶7"in 1941 and my father in `59", told in Creation and Faith (nid 1167)
    Why pm-actor-525: refuted by the M7 dating pass (529; 525's readers, packet 008): Mis-parses passage 531903's 'in 1941 and my father in '59' as a range for the mother's death, when it states two different people's separate death years.
Show all 9 claims
  1. between 1941 and 1967 stated · refuted
    Source Become Like a Child ¶31"since 1941", told in Become Like a Child (nid 1249)
    Why pm-actor-525: refuted by the M7 dating pass (529; 525's readers, packet 008): Mis-parses passage 534784's 'gone from this world since 1941' (a since-marker meaning the year is 1941) as a range extending to 1967.
Place
Told / reported
  1. 20 May 1968 stated
    Source Creation and FaithCreation and Faith (nid 1167), telling 1167-1, told 1968-05-20
  2. 21 January 1966 stated
    Source The Human ImaginationThe Human Imagination (nid 1233), telling 1233-4, told 1966-01-21
  3. 4 January 1967 stated · doubtful
    Source Become Like a ChildBecome Like a Child (nid 1249), telling 1249-4, told 1967-01-04
  4. 1970 stated
    Source The Divine Bodycertain internal present-year claim on lecture nid 1036
    Reasoning Passages 528442 and 528443 belong to lecture 1036, whose transcript explicitly establishes the year 1970 but no finer date.
  5. 7 January 1966 stated
    Source Believe It Incertain chrome-confirmed delivery claim on lecture nid 1859
    Reasoning Passage 547091 belongs to lecture 1859, whose exact 1966-01-07 date is confirmed by recovered chrome.
  6. 14 January 1966 estimated
    Source The Bible Is All About Younid 1232 surviving delivery claim after refutation. All claims: 1966-1-14 certain; 1969-4-7 refuted; 1966-1-14 certain (preferred)
    Why Lane L7 (#2354) re-derivation. Supersedes in substance, not in storage, the refuted-date told claim(s) on this event; those rows stand per append-only.
    Reasoning Re-derived, not walked down. The existing told claim(s) on this event took their date from a delivery claim on node 1232 that the corpus has since REFUTED, so the corpus was asserting that Neville told this on a day it separately says he did not lecture. That is a contradiction rather than an over-confidence, and lowering the confidence would have hidden it instead of resolving it. The refutation stands and the told claim is the wrong side of it. Node 1232 surviving (non-refuted) claim: 1966-1-14 at `certain`. All claims on the node: 1966-1-14 certain; 1969-4-7 refuted; 1966-1-14 certain (preferred). Superseded here: delta 1: 1969-04-07 at `certain` (run `corpus v1 / phase3b`). The telling is dated by its lecture, so with the refuted date removed from consideration the surviving claim is what the telling inherits, at that claim own confidence and no higher.
  7. 4 October 1966 estimated
    Source Eternity Withinnid 1242 surviving delivery claim after refutation. All claims: 1966-10-4 certain; 1967-1-17 refuted; 1966-10-4 certain (preferred)
    Why Lane L7 (#2354) re-derivation. Supersedes in substance, not in storage, the refuted-date told claim(s) on this event; those rows stand per append-only.
    Reasoning Re-derived, not walked down. The existing told claim(s) on this event took their date from a delivery claim on node 1242 that the corpus has since REFUTED, so the corpus was asserting that Neville told this on a day it separately says he did not lecture. That is a contradiction rather than an over-confidence, and lowering the confidence would have hidden it instead of resolving it. The refutation stands and the told claim is the wrong side of it. Node 1242 surviving (non-refuted) claim: 1966-10-4 at `certain`. All claims on the node: 1966-10-4 certain; 1967-1-17 refuted; 1966-10-4 certain (preferred). Superseded here: delta 3: 1967-01-17 at `certain` (run `corpus v1 / phase3b`). The telling is dated by its lecture, so with the refuted date removed from consideration the surviving claim is what the telling inherits, at that claim own confidence and no higher.
  8. 7 October 1966 estimated · probable
    Source Free or Slavenid 1252 surviving delivery claim after refutation. All claims: 1967-1-18 refuted; 1966-10-7 probable (preferred)
    Why Lane L7 (#2354) re-derivation. Supersedes in substance, not in storage, the refuted-date told claim(s) on this event; those rows stand per append-only.
    Reasoning Re-derived, not walked down. The existing told claim(s) on this event took their date from a delivery claim on node 1252 that the corpus has since REFUTED, so the corpus was asserting that Neville told this on a day it separately says he did not lecture. That is a contradiction rather than an over-confidence, and lowering the confidence would have hidden it instead of resolving it. The refutation stands and the told claim is the wrong side of it. Node 1252 surviving (non-refuted) claim: 1966-10-7 at `probable`. All claims on the node: 1967-1-18 refuted; 1966-10-7 probable (preferred). Superseded here: delta 5: 1967-01-18 at `certain` (run `corpus v1 / phase3b`) | delta 8: 1967-01-18 at `probable` (run `v1.1/l4/ceiling/c2`). The telling is dated by its lecture, so with the refuted date removed from consideration the surviving claim is what the telling inherits, at that claim own confidence and no higher.
Show all 15 claims
  1. 1972 estimated · probable
    Reasoning Passage 553779 narrates the mother's death within lecture nid=2137 ('Immortal Man'), whose own delivery date (1972, year only) is an unreviewed legacy backfill copied from historical event 1195, not independently verified here. || v1.1 type repair: written as `stated` by run v1.1/l4/actor417/8000-9999-b17, retyped `estimated` — the claim cites node 2137, not a passage, so it is this lane's inference rather than something Neville said in so many words (#2117).
  2. 4 December 1967 stated
    Source He Supplies the Spirit in UsHe Supplies the Spirit in Us (nid 1312), telling 1312-4, told 1967-12-04
  3. 7 April 1969 stated · refuted
    Source The Bible Is All About YouThe Bible Is All About You (nid 1232), telling 1232-6, told 1969-04-07
    Reasoning || v1.1/l7/told-close: the delivery claim this was derived from (nid 1232, 1969-4-7) was refuted by the L7 adjudication (#2363). The corrected told claim from the same lecture stands at 1966-1-14. This row is retired rather than deleted so the derivation history remains readable.
  4. 17 January 1967 stated · refuted
    Source Eternity WithinEternity Within (nid 1242), telling 1242-8, told 1967-01-17
    Reasoning || v1.1/l7/told-close: the delivery claim this was derived from (nid 1242, 1967-1-17) was refuted by the L7 adjudication (#2363). The corrected told claim from the same lecture stands at 1966-10-4. This row is retired rather than deleted so the derivation history remains readable.
  5. 18 January 1967 stated · refuted
    Source Free or SlaveFree or Slave (nid 1252), telling 1252-5, told 1967-01-18
    Reasoning || v1.1/l7/told-close: the delivery claim this was derived from (nid 1252, 1967-1-18) was refuted by the L7 adjudication (#2363). The corrected told claim from the same lecture stands at 1966-10-7. This row is retired rather than deleted so the derivation history remains readable.
  6. 18 January 1967 stated · refuted
    Source Free or SlaveFree or Slave (nid 1252), telling 1252-5, told 1967-01-18
    Why Corrects the confidence of the told claim written by run `corpus v1 / phase3b` at delta 5 on this event; that claim is left standing per append-only. Ceiling rule #2132.
    Reasoning Confidence only; the date is not re-adjudicated and is left exactly as written. This claim is derived from the delivery claims of node 1252 and asserts `certain`, but the strongest claim that node carries is `probable`, so there is nothing for `certain` to inherit from. nid 1252 delivery claims: 1967-1-18 possible; 1966-10-7 probable. Walked back to `probable`, the ceiling. Whether the DATE is right is a separate question this row does not touch; if the evidence turns out to support more confidence, it will have to come from a source other than this node. || v1.1/l7/told-close: the delivery claim this was derived from (nid 1252, 1967-1-18) was refuted by the L7 adjudication (#2363). The corrected told claim from the same lecture stands at 1966-10-7. This row is retired rather than deleted so the derivation history remains readable.
  7. 21 August 1969 stated · refuted
    Source The Promise's Fulfillment in YouThe Promise's Fulfillment in You (nid 1474), telling 1474-0, told 1969-08-21
    Reasoning || v1.1/l7/told-lower: lowered `certain` -> `doubtful`. The telling-date 1969-08-21 is refuted on the source lecture (nid 1474) and no live claim on that node supports it, so the corpus can no longer say WHEN this was told. ⛔ The row is KEPT, not retired: it also records THAT nid 1474 tells this event, which is true and checkable from the passages, and retiring it would discard that with the date.
Sources

Source

  • The Finances Of Neville Goddard What He Charged For Lectures And Why He Never Charged For Private Interviews ¶4 (She died in ’41)
  • Creation and Faith ¶7 (Although my mother left this world in 1941 and my father in `59, I can bring them into my mind’s eye and hear them speak of their pride in their son.)
  • The Bible Is All About You ¶30 (My father broke every eating rule in the world and drinking rule…he and Churchill. When Churchill came home, he always wanted my father, right away.)
  • The Human Imagination ¶31 (Yet the moment she died, 2,000 miles away from where I was, she appeared this beautiful, glamorous woman about twenty, nineteen, twenty, twenty-one, just brushing her lovely long blonde hair.)
  • Eternity Within ¶41 (My mother was only 61 when she left here, but she looked 90 because she had suffered so for two years and her lovely form had withered before our eyes. I have seen her at the age of twenty, radiantly beautiful.)
  • Become Like a Child ¶31 (The mother that I knew and loved and love dearly—she’s gone from this world since 1941—if she sat here tonight and heard me, she’d be shocked beyond measure. She would wonder “Did I raise this boy to speak like this? For this is not my son Neville.”)
  • Free or Slave ¶28 (I’m convinced that she raised me and nursed me at her own breast. In those days we didn’t have other things other than the breast of woman, so I nursed her. And she loved me dearly to the very moment she closed her eyes, and she still does. I meet her.)
  • Believe It In ¶11 (In fact, mother had just gone, for she left us in 1941.)
  • He Supplies the Spirit in Us ¶25 (My mother who bore twelve children, and lost two at birth, and raised ten of us…and mother loved, truly loved.)
  • The Promise's Fulfillment in You ¶7 (Well, my physical mother bearing her ten children that she raised, she wove garments of flesh.)