Neville's 1933 Barbados journey under Abdullah's instruction
Date (happened)
1933
stated · preferred
Why
Corroborated twice more in the same telling (passages 549266 and 549268); all three are the same single telling, not independent sources.
Reasoning
Neville states the year directly and unambiguously in the passage recounting the Barbados/Abdullah episode, and repeats '1933' twice more later in the same lecture (passages 549266, 549268) describing the same events. This is a first-hand stated date from the witness text itself, stronger than the existing title-derived claim.
1933
stated · probable
Source
derived from the event's own title: "Neville's 1933 Barbados journey under Abdullah's instruction"
Reasoning
The event held NO date claim of any kind; its own title states 1933 (year precision, parsed as "year only"). ⚠ A title in this corpus is a DERIVED artefact — an earlier pass wrote it from the passage text — so this claim is title-derived and is marked as such rather than cited as a source document; the underlying text remains the real evidence and would supersede it. Confidence `probable`, never `certain`, for that reason. Precision is never inflated beyond the title's own wording. CALIBRATION (run v1.1/l1.4/titledate, against the 489 events that already hold an independent preferred date): day 96.1%, month 94.1% agreement. Titles naming a REFERENCE event rather than the event itself ("before", "after", "during the week of", "per ... lecture") are refused outright and never reach this write — reading an anchor as the date is the same laundering phase3b committed when it wrote telling dates onto events.
Told / reported
4 June 1971
estimated · possible
Why
Flagged in the source packet as possibly the header of a different talk sitting on this node; lane L1.3 owns the identity question.
Reasoning
This is when Neville told the 1933 Barbados story from the platform, distinct from when it happened. The lecture's preferred delivery claim is 1971-06-04, but that claim is itself only 'possible' in the packet because its scraped chrome header title ('I Am All Imagination') does not match this node's title, raising doubt it belongs here rather than to another talk; the alternative 1969-05-26 catalogue claim is refuted, so nothing can be derived from it either. Confidence capped at possible per the inheritance ceiling.