Neville's 1952 mystical 'procession' experience
Neville dated to 1952, while living in New York City, a mystical experience of a great procession to the house of God and a voice identifying him with God.
Place: New York City
Person: Neville Goddard
Date (happened)
-
1952
stated · probable
Source
biography_mysticism.md — "In 1952, while living in New York City...God walks with them...at your side"
1952
stated · probable
Source
biography_mysticism.md — "I became six vortices, which I felt enter my hands, my feet, my head, and my side"
c. 1952
stated · probable
-
c. 1952
stated · probable
-
before 1963
bound · possible
Reasoning
Qualifying passage ids [530380] belong to telling lecture nids [1107]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1963 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1963 is the MIN across telling lectures.
Show all 34 claims
before 17 May 1963
bound
Why
Tightens the phase4 L6a envelope from before 1963 to before 1963-05-17.
Reasoning
L6a envelope tightened to the telling day of nid 1107 (certain delivery 1963-05-17); same premise, finer precision. The phase4 L6a bound on this event is `before 1963`, an envelope over delivery YEARS computed without reading text. Its premise is that the fact is true by the time it is told; on that same premise the DAY of the telling is a strictly better upper bound. Nothing is re-decided — the bound is stated to the precision the evidence always supported. The delivery claim for 1963-05-17 on nid 1107 is held at `certain` by the corpus, which is what carries this claim. #2274; the L6a row stands beside this one.
before 1964
bound · possible
Reasoning
Qualifying passage ids [531943] belong to telling lecture nids [1169]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1964 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1964 is the MIN across telling lectures.
before 26 May 1964
bound
Why
Tightens the phase4 L6a envelope from before 1964 to before 1964-05-26.
Reasoning
L6a envelope tightened to the telling day of nid 1169 (certain delivery 1964-05-26); same premise, finer precision. The phase4 L6a bound on this event is `before 1964`, an envelope over delivery YEARS computed without reading text. Its premise is that the fact is true by the time it is told; on that same premise the DAY of the telling is a strictly better upper bound. Nothing is re-decided — the bound is stated to the precision the evidence always supported. The delivery claim for 1964-05-26 on nid 1169 is held at `certain` by the corpus, which is what carries this claim. #2274; the L6a row stands beside this one.
between 1950 and 1952
estimated · possible
Why
M7 dating pass (529; 525's readers, packet 008)
Reasoning
Passage 531943 (procession, 'Is Neville God?', nailed on his body) matches event 855 (mystical procession experience, 1952, New York) and 15602; event 18409 puts an ecstatic crucifixion vision in 1950. Catalogue-level dating, hence possible.
-
before 20 November 1964
bound
Why
Existing stored field_date (before 1964, stated/certain) mistypes a before-claim as stated; left untouched per append-only rule.
Reasoning
The vision is placed only as 'many years ago', a vague interval, so it gives an upper bound rather than a point: the event predates the telling. The telling date, 1964-11-20, is certain (independently corroborated by legacy catalog #240 and a separate chrome dateline harvest). A before/after claim must be typed bound per this brief's typing rule, and the existing stored claim (before 1964, certain) is mistyped stated; this claim corrects the type and sharpens the year-level bound to the exact, certain telling date.
before 1956
bound
Reasoning
v1.1/l0.5/retype/w1: type stated -> bound. The 1956 date belongs to a separate biographical fact — Neville's move out West — and this mystical experience is only bounded by having occurred while he still lived in New York before that move, exactly the Pavlova pattern of a dated fact about something else supplying the boundary.
c. 1952
estimated · probable
Why
M7 dating pass (529; 525's readers, packet 001): its source hist_event 855 does not exist on www: left off
Reasoning
Leading a throng towards the house of God and feeling the vortices of crucifixion while living in New York (passage 536647) matches 855 (1952 procession, New York City) and 18841 (1952, six vortices), both certain-dated; the 'before 1956' bound is consistent.
before 1968
bound · possible
Reasoning
Qualifying passage ids [538360] belong to telling lecture nids [1367]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1968 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1968 is the MIN across telling lectures.
before 14 June 1968
bound
Why
Tightens the phase4 L6a envelope from before 1968 to before 1968-06-14.
Reasoning
L6a envelope tightened to the telling day of nid 1367 (certain delivery 1968-06-14); same premise, finer precision. The phase4 L6a bound on this event is `before 1968`, an envelope over delivery YEARS computed without reading text. Its premise is that the fact is true by the time it is told; on that same premise the DAY of the telling is a strictly better upper bound. Nothing is re-decided — the bound is stated to the precision the evidence always supported. The delivery claim for 1968-06-14 on nid 1367 is held at `certain` by the corpus, which is what carries this claim. #2274; the L6a row stands beside this one.
c. 1952
estimated · probable
Why
M7 dating pass (529; 525's readers, packet 020)
Reasoning
Same vision as chronology 855 (1952 procession, New York) and 15602 (divine procession, before 1964); passage 538360 has the Psalm 42 procession and 'Yes, in the act of waking'.
before 24 February 1969
bound
Source
bound from the telling lecture nid 1423 (1969-02-24)
Reasoning
The event is told in the past tense in nid 1423, delivered 1969-02-24 (that claim's confidence: certain, preferred), so it had happened by that date. This is the same premise phase4 L6a and L4.5 rest on, stated at the precision the evidence actually supports rather than as a fabricated year. It replaces nothing: the 1900 placeholder row remains, lowered, as the record of what phase3b did. `bound` is never `preferred`, so this does not change what the event displays.
before 1969
bound · possible
Reasoning
Qualifying passage ids [539532] belong to telling lecture nids [1423]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1969 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1969 is the MIN across telling lectures.
before 24 February 1969
bound
Why
Tightens the phase4 L6a envelope from before 1969 to before 1969-02-24.
Reasoning
L6a envelope tightened to the telling day of nid 1423 (certain delivery 1969-02-24); same premise, finer precision. The phase4 L6a bound on this event is `before 1969`, an envelope over delivery YEARS computed without reading text. Its premise is that the fact is true by the time it is told; on that same premise the DAY of the telling is a strictly better upper bound. Nothing is re-decided — the bound is stated to the precision the evidence always supported. The delivery claim for 1969-02-24 on nid 1423 is held at `certain` by the corpus, which is what carries this claim. #2274; the L6a row stands beside this one.
before 1970
bound · possible
Reasoning
Qualifying passage ids [541789] belong to telling lecture nids [1517]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1970 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1970 is the MIN across telling lectures.
before 7 July 1970
bound
Why
Tightens the phase4 L6a envelope from before 1970 to before 1970-07-07.
Reasoning
L6a envelope tightened to the telling day of nid 1517 (certain delivery 1970-07-07); same premise, finer precision. The phase4 L6a bound on this event is `before 1970`, an envelope over delivery YEARS computed without reading text. Its premise is that the fact is true by the time it is told; on that same premise the DAY of the telling is a strictly better upper bound. Nothing is re-decided — the bound is stated to the precision the evidence always supported. The delivery claim for 1970-07-07 on nid 1517 is held at `certain` by the corpus, which is what carries this claim. #2274; the L6a row stands beside this one.
c. 1952
estimated · possible
Why
M7 dating pass (529; 525's readers, packet 028)
Reasoning
Passage 541789 (the night he replayed Psalm 42, leading a procession into the house of God, the woman and the voice 'in the act of waking'). The chronology has 'Neville's 1952 mystical procession experience' (855, New York City) and 'leads a divine procession and is nailed by vortices' (15602, before 1964). Identification is by content; the 1952 date is the database's.
before 1972
bound · possible
Reasoning
Qualifying passage ids [542271] belong to telling lecture nids [1538]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1972 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1972 is the MIN across telling lectures.
before 31 March 1972
bound
Why
Tightens the phase4 L6a envelope from before 1972 to before 1972-03-31.
Reasoning
L6a envelope tightened to the telling day of nid 1538 (certain delivery 1972-03-31); same premise, finer precision. The phase4 L6a bound on this event is `before 1972`, an envelope over delivery YEARS computed without reading text. Its premise is that the fact is true by the time it is told; on that same premise the DAY of the telling is a strictly better upper bound. Nothing is re-decided — the bound is stated to the precision the evidence always supported. The delivery claim for 1972-03-31 on nid 1538 is held at `certain` by the corpus, which is what carries this claim. #2274; the L6a row stands beside this one.
1952
estimated · probable
Why
M7 dating pass (529; 525's readers, packet 030)
Reasoning
Passage 542271 tells the procession to the house of God and the voice from outer space. The chronology has the 1952 mystical 'procession' (855, New York City), 'returns from a divine pilgrimage as six vortices' (18841, 1952), and 'leads a divine procession and is nailed by vortices' (15602, before 1964).
before 1966
bound · possible
Reasoning
Qualifying passage ids [546976] belong to telling lecture nids [1857]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1966 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1966 is the MIN across telling lectures.
before 25 February 1966
bound
Why
Existing before-1966/possible bound (phase4 L6a envelope) left in place; this is a sharper addition.
Reasoning
The vision and crucifixion experience are recounted in definite past tense with no date of their own in the passage, so they can only be bounded by the telling. The lecture's delivery is fixed at 1966-02-25 (certain), sharper than the existing before-1966/possible bound built from the year-only envelope value.
c. 1952
estimated · probable
Why
M7 dating pass (529; 525's readers, packet 013)
Reasoning
Passage 546976 (crowd, 'And God walks with them', 'Is Neville God? Yes, in the act of waking') and the described six-vortex crucifixion match the certain-dated records 855 (1952 'procession' experience, New York), 18841 (1952, six vortices) and 15602 (leads a divine procession and is nailed by vortices, before 1964).
before 1963
bound · possible
Reasoning
Qualifying passage ids [548490] belong to telling lecture nids [1908]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1963 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1963 is the MIN across telling lectures.
before 9 April 1963
bound
Why
Tightens the phase4 L6a envelope from before 1963 to before 1963-04-09.
Reasoning
L6a envelope tightened to the telling day of nid 1908 (certain delivery 1963-04-09); same premise, finer precision. The phase4 L6a bound on this event is `before 1963`, an envelope over delivery YEARS computed without reading text. Its premise is that the fact is true by the time it is told; on that same premise the DAY of the telling is a strictly better upper bound. Nothing is re-decided — the bound is stated to the precision the evidence always supported. The delivery claim for 1963-04-09 on nid 1908 is held at `certain` by the corpus, which is what carries this claim. #2274; the L6a row stands beside this one.
c. 1900
stated · refuted
Reasoning
|| v1.1/l1.4/sentinel1900: year 1900 here is not a date. `corpus v1 / phase3b` emitted it as a placeholder for "unknown, sometime before the telling" whenever the speaker used a vague temporal phrase — this row's own source note is the phrase. The same sentinel was identified and converged on in run v1.1/l0.5/retype/w1-conv. It carried confidence `probable`, which no evidence supported. Lowered to `doubtful`; an honest `before 1969-02-24` bound is appended alongside from the telling lecture (nid 1423). Nothing deleted, no year invented. || v1.1/l1.4/sentinel1900-refute: REFUTED. This event involves Neville himself and he was born 1905-02-19 (event 950 delta 9, `certain` + `preferred`), so 1900 is not merely unsupported — it is impossible. The event now displays no date, which is the honest state: the `before` bound appended by v1.1/l1.4/sentinel1900 remains and is what is actually known. Row kept, not deleted.
Told / reported
20 November 1967
stated · probable · preferred
Source
biography_mysticism.md
20 November 1967
stated · probable
Source
biography_mysticism.md
-
-
-
-
-
-
Show all 28 claims
-
-
-
-
-
18 June 1971
estimated · probable
Why
Lane L7 (#2354) re-derivation. Supersedes in substance, not in storage, the refuted-date told claim(s) on this event; those rows stand per append-only.
Reasoning
Re-derived, not walked down. The existing told claim(s) on this event took their date from a delivery claim on node 1055 that the corpus has since REFUTED, so the corpus was asserting that Neville told this on a day it separately says he did not lecture. That is a contradiction rather than an over-confidence, and lowering the confidence would have hidden it instead of resolving it. The refutation stands and the told claim is the wrong side of it. Node 1055 surviving (non-refuted) claim: 1971-6-18 at `probable`. All claims on the node: 1959-5-10 refuted; 1971-6-18 probable (preferred). Superseded here: delta 3: 1959-05-10 at `certain` (run `corpus v1 / phase3b`) | delta 15: 1959-05-10 at `probable` (run `v1.1/l4/ceiling/c2`). The telling is dated by its lecture, so with the refuted date removed from consideration the surviving claim is what the telling inherits, at that claim own confidence and no higher.
9 December 1966
estimated
Why
Lane L7 (#2354) re-derivation. Supersedes in substance, not in storage, the refuted-date told claim(s) on this event; those rows stand per append-only.
Reasoning
Re-derived, not walked down. The existing told claim(s) on this event took their date from a delivery claim on node 1257 that the corpus has since REFUTED, so the corpus was asserting that Neville told this on a day it separately says he did not lecture. That is a contradiction rather than an over-confidence, and lowering the confidence would have hidden it instead of resolving it. The refutation stands and the told claim is the wrong side of it. Node 1257 surviving (non-refuted) claim: 1966-12-9 at `certain`. All claims on the node: 1967-1-26 refuted; 1966-12-9 certain (preferred). Superseded here: delta 5: 1967-01-26 at `certain` (run `corpus v1 / phase3b`). The telling is dated by its lecture, so with the refuted date removed from consideration the surviving claim is what the telling inherits, at that claim own confidence and no higher.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
25 February 1966
estimated
Reasoning
Neville recounts this vision from the platform in this lecture; the telling date is the lecture's own delivery date, 1966-02-25 (certain). No field_told claim existed for this event.
-
10 May 1959
stated · refuted
Reasoning
|| v1.1/l7/told-close: the delivery claim this was derived from (nid 1055, 1959-5-10) was refuted by the L7 adjudication (#2363). The corrected told claim from the same lecture stands at 1971-6-18. This row is retired rather than deleted so the derivation history remains readable.
26 January 1967
stated · refuted
Reasoning
|| v1.1/l7/told-close: the delivery claim this was derived from (nid 1257, 1967-1-26) was refuted by the L7 adjudication (#2363). The corrected told claim from the same lecture stands at 1966-12-9. This row is retired rather than deleted so the derivation history remains readable.
10 May 1959
stated · refuted
Why
Corrects the confidence of the told claim written by run `corpus v1 / phase3b` at delta 3 on this event; that claim is left standing per append-only. Ceiling rule #2132.
Reasoning
Confidence only; the date is not re-adjudicated and is left exactly as written. This claim is derived from the delivery claims of node 1055 and asserts `certain`, but the strongest claim that node carries is `probable`, so there is nothing for `certain` to inherit from. nid 1055 delivery claims: 1959-5-10 doubtful; 1971-6-18 probable. Walked back to `probable`, the ceiling. Whether the DATE is right is a separate question this row does not touch; if the evidence turns out to support more confidence, it will have to come from a source other than this node. || v1.1/l7/told-close: the delivery claim this was derived from (nid 1055, 1959-5-10) was refuted by the L7 adjudication (#2363). The corrected told claim from the same lecture stands at 1971-6-18. This row is retired rather than deleted so the derivation history remains readable.
Sources
Source
- Biography Mysticism ¶2 (I became six vortices, which I felt enter my hands, my feet, my head, and my side)
- The Marks of Jesus ¶16 (these came directly to me when I led this crowd in this gay procession into the house of God, and the voice described the king that no one was looking for, an entirely different king. Then the voice said he laid himself down within me to sleep, and as he…)
- Who Paul Really Is ¶8 (She turned to her left, looked into my face; and then she said, “What! Is Neville God?” And the voice replied, “Yes, in the act of waking.”)
- Building Your Temple ¶21 (In 1952, while living in New York City, I had a thirst that only an experience of God could quench.)
- We Are Witnesses ¶21 (I became so ecstatically happy that I couldn’t resist responding and reacting to the emotion. For he’s sleeping within me! That God laid himself down within me to sleep!)
- He Stirs in Me ¶10 (The voice said to me from the depths of my soul, “I laid myself down within you to sleep and as I slept I dreamed a dream, I dreamed…” and I knew the end, “I dreamed that I am you.”)
- The Name of Judah ¶34 (And may I tell you from my own personal experience, in that mystical crucifixion it was infinite joy! Ecstasy!)
- What Is Truth ¶20 (I remember when I walked in procession to the house of God, when a voice rang out saying: “And God walks with them.” A woman questioned the voice, saying: “If God walks with us, where is he?” and the voice replied: “At yours side.”)
- The Heavenly Vision ¶25 (She took it literally and turned to her left—she could have turned to her right but she turned to her left—looked into my face and became hysterical. It struck her so funnily that she said, “What? Neville is God?” and the voice came back, and all heard i…)
- Thy Words Were Found ¶46 (That was my triumphal journey into the holy city, when I heard the voice, and the crowd that I led in procession to the house of God. What the voice said to me and it was heard only by me from the depths of my own soul.)
- Initiative ¶7 (And she looked at her side, and looked into my face, and the most derisive laughter, hysterical laughter. It struck her so funnily. And then she said to the voice, “What? Is Neville God?” And the voice answered, “Yes, in the act of waking.”)
- Eschatology, the Doctrine of the Mind ¶14 (That night, in vision I found myself leading an enormous crowd in gay procession to the house of God as a voice rang out: “And God walks with them.”)
- Andrew ¶23 (Here I am, walking — this enormous procession, this enormous crowd, and I’m leading them up to the house of God, and suddenly a voice rings out, and God walks with them, and then a woman at my side — she asked the voice, who showed no face, just the voic…)
- The Marks of Jesus ¶7 (So now she addresses again this voice — it has no face, it has no form — and she says to the voice that spoke to all of us, “You mean that Neville is God?” And the voice replied, “Yes.”)
- The Marks of Jesus ¶38 (They heard this wonderful conversation between the woman and God, the voice of authority, but when it came to the very end, I, and I alone, heard it, and it came from the depths of my being)
- His to Give Yours to Receive ¶14 (And she said to the Voice, “What! Is Neville God?” And the Voice replied, “Yes, in the act of awakening.)
- The Cross ¶18 (It’s a thrill beyond the wildest dream when you feel yourself sucked in like a vortex, or a series of vortices, sucked into this body. I’ve had that.)
- Call the Next Witness ¶10 (Then she turned to her left and looked into my face, my eyes, and then she became hysterical. She said, “What, is Neville God?” and she was really hysterical with laughter it struck her so funnily. The voice replied, “Yes, in the act of waking.”)
- What Does the Lord Require ¶8 (Many years ago I found myself in vision leading a throng in a gay procession towards some invisible house of God. The crowd was thick, and as far as vision could go, an enormous crowd, all in gay Near East costumes.)
- Purpose: To Build a Dwelling Place for God ¶19 (Before I came out West and took up residence here in 1956 when I lived in New York City, this 42nd Psalm unfolded within me this night.)
- Old Testament Is Prophetic Blueprint of the Life of Jesus Christ ¶11 (She said, “Is Neville God?” and the voice answered, “Yes, in the act of waking.”)
- God Became Man ¶3 (Hearing a voice in the depths of my soul proclaim I am God in the act of waking, I began to whirl in space and time. Then I felt myself being sucked into this crucifix. My hands were vortices, my feet vortices, my side a vortex and my head a vortex as I …)
- God Became Man ¶16 (I remember the night I led the procession to the house of God. I can still feel the ecstasy I knew as I became the six vortices – the Magen David, the great Star of David – and was sucked into and took upon myself the cross of man.)
- The Morning Star ¶26 (she said, “What! Is Neville God?” and the voice replied, “Yes, in the act of waking.”)
- Where and When Did It Happen ¶2 (This night in question, I was leading an enormous crowd, a gay crowd, a very festive crowd, a huge multitude, and leading them to the house of God. And as we walked in this gay manner, a voice rang out from outer space. And the voice said, “And God walks…)
- Neville's Thoughts If Leaving Permanently ¶9 (Then she said, “What? Is Neville God?” and the voice rang out that all could hear, “Yes, in the act of waking.”)
- The Crucifixion ¶5 (This night in question, I was walking with an enormous number, as though the whole of humanity walked in a certain direction and I was one of the unnumbered.)
- Initiative ¶6
- Initiative ¶9